Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K2.6
Side-by-side comparison across metrics, pricing, and overall score — every value traced to a source.
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks highest overall (#5) with a score of 50.8.
The best choice still depends on which metrics matter for your workload — per-metric winners are marked below.
What the numbers hide
Computed from the published values below — no estimates, no generated claims.
Fragile verdict
The overall winner flips to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if SWE-Bench Pro Score is weighted at 35% (it counts for 29% today). If swe-bench pro score drives your decision, the ranking above may not be your ranking.
Fragile verdict
The overall winner flips to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if Context Window is weighted at 25% (it counts for 18% today). If context window drives your decision, the ranking above may not be your ranking.
Real tradeoff
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview clearly beats Kimi K2.6 on Context Window but clearly loses on Input Price — this pair is a priorities question, not a quality question.
AI hot take
Sign in to generate a contrarian AI read of this comparison.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle | Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Overall OptiSift Score | 50.8#5 | 32.9#8 |
| Input Price | $2 | $0.95 |
| Output Price | $12 | $4 |
| Cache Read Price | $0.2 | $0.16 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 66K | 262K |
| SWE-Bench Pro Score | 54.2% | 27.3% |
| Tool Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Extended Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
About these models
#5Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google's reasoning-capable model: $2/$12 per 1M input/output tokens, 1.0M token context window, 54.2% on SWE-Bench Pro.
#8Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's reasoning-capable model: $0.95/$4 per 1M input/output tokens, 262K token context window, 27.3% on SWE-Bench Pro.