Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
Side-by-side comparison across metrics, pricing, and overall score — every value traced to a source.
Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks highest overall (#7) with a score of 33.1.
The best choice still depends on which metrics matter for your workload — per-metric winners are marked below.
What the numbers hide
Computed from the published values below — no estimates, no generated claims.
Fragile verdict
The overall winner flips to Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct if SWE-Bench Pro Score is weighted at 100% (it counts for 29% today). If swe-bench pro score drives your decision, the ranking above may not be your ranking.
What nobody reports
Input Price (1 of 2 missing) · Output Price (1 of 2 missing) · Cache Read Price (1 of 2 missing) — the questions worth asking vendors directly.
AI hot take
Sign in to generate a contrarian AI read of this comparison.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle | Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Overall OptiSift Score | 33.1#7 | 21.1#16 |
| Input Price | $1.5 | — |
| Output Price | $9 | — |
| Cache Read Price | $0.15 | — |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 66K | 16K |
| SWE-Bench Pro Score | — | 5.24% |
| Tool Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Extended Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tokens per Wh (efficiency) | — | 7,435 |